Auditing Firms In Kenya

The " censorship "allegations of the group 170

little surprised we have taken note of the allegations, which make the group 170 »Veranstalter_innen the demonstration against the anti-Semitic club impossible - also left" in the Zeck rises No. 154th On the occasion of the documentation of their rejected by the Veranstalter_innen speech by stating "the censor our speech by" the allegedly "just like any other ... been the preparation committee submitted "was, was a "Insolence" and a "destructive political action" that they leave "doubt the motives of the organizing."

The group 170 has not supported the demonstration call nor participated in the preparatory meetings. Of the existence of the group we have experienced, as we in the Alliance meeting on 8.12. their interest was focused on 13.12. to give a speech on the 'Assign the arguments of the call would be criticized'. the text of the speech was made the groups involved three days before the demonstration by e-mail distribution list available - at a time when, as a substantive discussion (as it was passed over other contentious posts quite) to think no more. Instead of several groups, some with detailed justifications, veto placed .

The interpretation of the events at the Barmbeker anti-Nazi demo, 31.1.2004, was noted in passing, just one of several contentious issues. One of the peculiarities of the debate on the left anti-Semitism is of course time and again that for sheer excitement, even the simplest facts are not taken seriously - here for example, that the call of the alliance at all from the beatings to which Israel and U.S. flags are talking about. is instead discussed by the attack on the kp berlin and her transparent "Germany is thinking Auschwitz," which had taken place before any "national flags" had aroused the minds of thinking - see http://phase2.nadir.org/rechts . php? article = 196 & print .

Just curious though, is that even an imaginary one criticism frequently resulting in that criticized make every effort to post a version for reasons that it is justified. Their campaign against " anti-German historical distortions " namely the group says 170 in a thank you " to the anti-fascist comrades " can culminate need to which the Barmbeker Demo " have blocked the encroachment of anti-German provocateurs " . But not matter what one thinks of anti-German hegemony in anti-fascist alliance demonstrations: Who would like to thank people, the Israeli flag at " Intifada " - and " murderer, murderer " connect-call in the mess only proves that even a clear statement against anti-Semitism before the cronyism protects Antisemit_innen.

Had the group 170 its planned review in advance of the demonstration, possibly as a separate call, published, would we have plenty angry still about the contained argument for free public places - and are still on the rejection of the autonomous lethargy, as it is predominantly in relation to the left anti-Semitism, happy. As a speech but had not been good for the text to the mobilization of the scene even opening a debate on many boos and some " Hear, hear! " could go. For this reason alone seemed puzzling, what had promised the group 170 of their desires. Equally puzzling to us, appeared as a political but hopefully not totally inexperienced group was able to hit upon the idea of a demonstration is something of a Speakers' Corner, where, without any substantive discussion in advance, can take everyone adds the word.

the indignant complaint of the group 170 on the organizing that have otherwise seen, is not just a little embarrassing, it ensures that their initiative will fit into the scheme exactly equidistant left again, she was originally the one asking the question.

We would therefore propose instead prefer to talk about rights, governance and sovereignty over discourse to argue that what it's worth to argue: the dissent in the case. To this end, we propose a public debate with Vertreter_innen of us and the group 170th

alliance against unreasonable Hamburg, February 2010

What Is World Bmi Mean

Renewed attack by activists on anti-B5 opponents


On the night of Sunday, 31 January 2010 attacked activists of the "International Centre B5" two israel solidarity anti-fascists. The two anti-Fascists who are active against including in the 'alliance against Hamburger unreasonableness "anti-Semitism were, after leaving a nightclub three receive rackets. The attackers shouted anti-Israeli slogans, walked with his fists and kicked their victims go, as they lay on the ground, a further on them. Only when it was among those concerned to call the police, the attackers fled.

early in the evening, a group of five people, including the attacker later, one of the victims on the street detected, whereupon they bepöbelten and physically harassed. It was the young man because he wore a button Israel, as " fascist " insults which the propagating "genocide against the Palestinians " . A few hours later came the B5-trailer into the nightclub, in which the two anti-fascists were, and continued the anti-Israeli bullying. As the attackers were violent times, including with targeted strikes in the face, they were finally expelled from the nightclub. Then they watched their Victims on their way home to. The two attacked suffered multiple bruises and abrasions. Against the unnamed attacker complaint was filed.

members of the "International Centre B5" in the past struck repeatedly by physical attacks on people and events antisemitimuskritische. In October 2009 it forcibly prevented a demonstration of Claude Lanzmann's film "Why Israel" in the Hamburg cinema b-movie. This incident, in which guests hit movie and others as "fags" and "Jewish pig" had been abused in mpörung provided at home and abroad for E . In response it had also the "alliance formed against Hamburger unreasonableness', which at 13.12., at the new setting of the movie Lanzmann film in b, left demonstrated against anti-Semitism.

Over the past few months, members of the coalition of activists from the B5 threatened several times and been physically attacked. With the recent attack on anti-Semitism opponents stressed the alliance's demand that the International Centre politically isolate and combat the threat it anti-Semitic propaganda at last. Anyone playing down the anti-Semitism and the violence the B5, there even with the organized groups working together politically further encourage the club to further attacks.

Prefers Cash On Invitation

documentation: a loud silent consensus

speculation about why the Left is so difficult to keep the presence of anti-Semitism in consciousness.

Introduction The following text is taken during the discussions about the violent and accompanied by openly anti-Semitic slogans prevention of the film "Why Israel" by Claude Lanzmann. It was written with the intention of using a current case on the general character of the debate to reflect anti-Semitism in the Left. The analyzed to this end, examples are more or less random, their characteristics would have on other Opinions or passages can be worked out, and the conclusions are therefore describing the claim, a more general dynamics. The text is written not only with the aim to discuss some commonly neglected aspects of anti-Semitism, but it should also be suitable to the experiences that arise when trying to focus attention on anti-Semitism in the Left, to make better discussion. This should also be possible for those who do not know the details of the incidents in Hamburg.

The demonstration of the alliance on the day of the show is now gone, and the discussions were about as part of the unusual. The dominant feature of the scenery here obviously from the desire to remain equidistant to the "armed irregulars can. In the run indicated that there would be little or no involvement in the otherwise normal conditions. All outside the Alliance acted as if it was the most normal thing in the world that a demo call is supported only if the call text every word of their own position corresponds to and then if no group is involved, which elsewhere has announced once a wrong . let Attempts to launch alternative views or to create their own blocks, has not existed.

It is not surprising that the attempt to repeat the blockade, is met with little opposition. That on the day of the demo "slap anti-German" as their route with graffiti - a very clear call for renewed use of force - provided was, is, as far as I can overlook the moment, been addressed by anyone outside of the alliance group. Also felt by those who for whatever reason, always wanted to participate in the demonstration, no one called, at least to help ensure that the cinema visitors can not be filmed or photographed. In summary words about the conflicts over the left anti-Semitism is a taboo imposed that all parties involved in an "all or nothing" attitude seems to result. to make understandable why this is neither a coincidence nor is individually motivated to indecision, but a part of the substantive issue that must be taken as such, in theory seriously is the central purpose of this text.

link to full text

Click here for the PDF version of the text